Global Health · Editorial & clinical governance
How we write and review medical content
Every clinical article we publish for Romania is drafted from primary sources and checked against them. A named physician registered with Colegiul Medicilor din România signs it off before publication. We review it again when the underlying rules change.
- Named reviewersClinical sign-off by a named, registered doctor
- Sourced to the regulatorRules link to the body that sets them
- Kept currentRe-reviewed at least once a year
Who writes our content
We draft articles using verified primary sources, including government guidance, national health authority publications and the social security or insurance documents that apply in the relevant country. Editorial tools may assist with drafting, but do not replace source checks and clinical review.
Articles carry the Global Health Editorial Team byline because the team shares drafting, research and editing. A physician registered with Colegiul Medicilor din România approves each article. Their name and registration number appear on it.
Who reviews it, and what they check
A registered physician reviews the full article before publication and checks its claims against the sources. Their name and registration number appear on the article so you can verify their registration.
Author
The Global Health Editorial Team
Every article is drafted, sourced and edited by our clinical editorial team, so it carries one consistent byline rather than rotating individual names.
Reviewer
Named clinical sign-off
A registered physician checks the article before publication, and again whenever it is materially updated. Their name and registration are published on the article.
The article names the physician who signed it off, with a registration you can check yourself. A published byline reads like this:
Global Health Editorial TeamClinically reviewed byDr Alexandra PalagaColegiul Medicilor din România | 159625, Pediatrician
Each reviewer name and registration number identifies a doctor on the public register for this market.
Editorial standards we hold ourselves to
Figures and thresholds are never hard-coded. Amounts, waiting periods and eligibility rules set by government or insurance bodies change over time. Where an article would otherwise state one, it links to the issuing body's own page instead, so you always see the current figure.
Every regulatory claim links to its source. Claims about entitlements, certification rules and legal processes link directly to the government department, health authority or regulator responsible for them.
Country-specific rules are written for that country. An article about sick leave in Romania is written and reviewed specifically for Romania, because rules vary between countries.
Nothing here replaces an individual assessment. Articles explain how a process generally works. They do not diagnose your condition or guarantee an outcome. Your individual circumstances require a consultation.
Emergency guidance is never generic. When an article describes warning signs that need urgent care, it includes the local emergency number, 112.
Keeping articles current
Regulatory content is reviewed at least once a year, or sooner if we become aware that a rule, form or process it describes has changed. Where an article has been clinically reviewed, the date of that review is shown on the article, so you can judge how current it is at a glance.
If a review results in a material change to the guidance, the reviewing physician's name and the review date are updated with it.
Found something that looks wrong?
Tell us. Every report is checked by a member of our clinical team, and corrections are made publicly and promptly.
This policy describes the editorial process for the general health information published on this site. It does not apply to personalised medical advice given during a consultation, which follows separate clinical governance standards. Read our medical disclaimer.
Policy last updated: